METODE IJTIHAD DALAM KONSTRUKSI HUKUM TAHKIM INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61136/pjtz2t92Keywords:
Tahkim, Ijtihad Tahkim, Tahkim Legal ConstructionAbstract
This paper provides input on where Tahkim or arbitration which is a form of dispute resolution outside the court and aims to reconcile the conflicting parties has existed and has long been practiced in the customs and culture of the Indonesian nation. However, with the increasing need for a peace model to resolve conflicts amid the rapid development of sharia business in Indonesia today, it is necessary to formulate a sharia tahkim model that
accommodates local values. The fiqh rules clearly state that al hukmuyadurruma’aillatihi wujudan waadaman, that the law is enforced
according to ilat whether it exists or does not exist, as well as the
taghayyural-ahkam bitaghayural amkinat waal-azman rule that the law
changes according to changes in place and time. The type of this
research is juridical philosophical with maslahah approach. The data
sources used are secondary and consist of three legal materials:
primary, secondary, and tertiary. The type of this research is juridical
philosophical with maslahah approach. The data sources used are
secondary data sources consisting of three legal materials, namely
primary, secondary and tertiary. The analysis was carried out using a
descriptive inductive technique. The results of this study are that
several ijtihad methods such as istihsan, maslahah mursalah, and
especially the technique of establishing law with 'urf can be used to
realize Indonesian Tahkim fiqh. The selection of these three methods,
especially the 'urf which is based on benefit and istihsan is very
suitable for conditions in Indonesia, considering that a culture of
peace rooted in adat is still very strong.
References
Agung Kurniawan, Hamsah Hudaf. (2021). “Konsep Maqashid Syariah Imam Asy-Syatibi Dalam Kitab Al-Muwafaqat.” Al Mabsut 15(1), 29-38
Al-Syatibi, Abu Ishaq. (2003). “Al-Muwafaqat Fi Ushul Al-Syari’ah.” Vol. II (Beirut: Dar Al Kutub Al Ilmiyah, Tt).
Ansori, Isa. (2021). “Menggagas Fikih Tahkim Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Syariah 09(1), 45–62.
Anwar, Syamsul. (2020). Studi Hukum Islam Kontemporer Bagian Dua. Yogyakarta: UAD Pres.
Ariprabowo, Tri, and R. Nazriyah. (2018). “Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14(4), 861-882.
Djalaluddin, Muhammad Mawardi. (2015). “Pemikiran Abu Ishaq Al Syatibi Dalam Kitab Al-Muwafaqat.” Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 4(2), 289-300
Gautama, Sudargo. (1986). Arbitrase Dagang Internasional. Bandung: Alumni.
Globalisasi, Abstraksi, Potensialitas Independensi, Lembaga Arbitrase, and Kata Kunci. n.d. “2. Potensialitas Arbitrase / Tahkim Sebagai Lembaga Independen Dalam Sengketa Bisnis.”
Hamdani, Fikri. (2018). “Hasbi Ash Shiddieqy dan Metode Penafsirannya.” Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Ushuluddin Dan Filsafat 12(1), 17-34
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2006). Arbitrase. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hardiati, Neni, Sindi Widiana, and Seproni Hidayat. (2021). “Model Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Indonesia.” Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Keuangan 1(5),1-12
Ismatulloh, A. M. (2017). “Etika Berkomunikasi Dalam Al-Qur’an Analisis Penafsiran Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqi dalam Tafsir An-Nur.” LENTERA: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Komunikasi 1(2), 129-146
Jimmy Joses Sembiring. (2011). Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan: Negosiasi, Mediasi, Konsiliasi & Arbitrase. Jakarta: Visi Media.
Kurniawan, Benny. (2017). “Studi Islam Dengan Pendekatan Filosofis.” SAINTIFIKA ISLAMICA: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 2(02), 49–60
Mahmod, Zulzaidi, and Ahmad Hidayat Buang. (2021). “Penulisan Penghakiman Menurut Perspektif Fiqh Al-Qaḍā’dan Aplikasi Mahkamah Syariah Di Malaysia.” Jurnal Fiqh 18(2), 377–408.
Margono, Suyud. (2000). ADR Dan Arbitrase Proses Pelembagaan Dan Aspek Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Maskufa, Maskufa. (2015). “Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Syariah Pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah.” Al-Iqtishad: Journal of Islamic Economics 5(1). doi: 10.15408/aiq.v5i1.2113.
Muskibah, Muskibah. (2018). “Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 4(2), 139-149
Nurhayati, Nurhayati. (2019). “Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Ekonomi Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 3(1), 1–11.
Rosita, Rosita. (2017). “Alternatif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi).” Al-Bayyinah 1(2),
Rosidah, Zaidah Nur, and Layyin Mahfiana. (2020). “Efektivitas Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas).” TAWAZUN : Journal of Sharia Economic Law 3(1),15-30
Shiddiqie, Tengku Muhammad Hasbi Ash. (1996). Sjariat Islam Menjawab Tantangan Zaman. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Sudini, Luh Putu, and Desak Gde Dwi Arini. (2017). “Eksistensi Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perusahaan.” Jurnal Notariil 2(2), 141-148
Tohari, Chamim. (2015). “Fiqh Keindonesiaan : Transformasi Hukum Islam Dalam Sistem Tata Hukum Di Indonesia.” ANALISIS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 15(2), 403-432
Usammah, Usammah. (2017). “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional.” Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, Akuntansi Dan Perbankan (JESKaPe) 1(1), 45-56
Uzma, Ummi. (2014). “Pelaksanaan Atau Eksekusi Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) Sebagai Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 44(3), 387-405.
